Faith, Ledyard & Faith, PLC
COVID-19 NOTIFICATION: To protect your safety and the safety of our staff, in response to the threat of COVID-19, we are offering the option to connect with us via telephone, email and video-conferencing. Our staff are fully operational. Please call or email us to discuss your options.
A Full-Service Law Firm Serving the West Valley and Greater Phoenix for More Than 40 Years
PA Image
Real Estate Law
PA Image
Personal Injury
PA Image
Civil Litigation
Construction Law
PA Image
Bankruptcy
PA Image
Employment Law
PA Image
Estate Planning
PA Image
Debt Collection
PA Image
Government Law
PA Image
Criminal Defense
PA Image
Business And
Commercial Law
PA Image
En Español

Construction defect liability relies on range of legal theories

| Jul 1, 2015 | Construction Law |

A construction defect is just what it sounds like an imperfection in construction. From a simple nail that has popped out, to leaky windows, there are many possible construction defects. While it may be simple to identify a particular construction defect, it can be more complex to hold a contractor liable in construction defect litigation. An Arizona homeowner may hope that when a party does not perform, whether a contractor or subcontractor, that party will be held legally liable and be required to remedy the defect. How this liability is established, and under what theory, may prove to be more complex than simply identifying the defect, however.

Construction defect liability is generally based on one of several theories. Negligence may exist if a contractor has not exercised a reasonable degree of skill, care or knowledge typical of a building professional in his or her field. General contractors and developers have the responsibility to ensure that their subcontractors do not act negligently.

In the event a developer intentionally misrepresents the construction quality of a building, and it is established that the developer intended not to follow the design plans as presented, that developer may be legally liable under a theory of fraud. Similarly, a developer may be liable under a theory of negligent misrepresentation if he or she presented something as fact, but did not have a reasonable basis upon which to make this assertion.

If a builder or developer breaches an obligation included in the purchase contract, he or she may be liable for breach of contract. Similarly, a breach of warranty theory may apply if a builder or developer fails to fulfill the warranties regarding a property’s condition.

Whether a builder, developer or contractor can be found to be legally liable for a construction defect can be a complex issue. The facts of each particular construction dispute will be relevant in determining under what theory of liability a party may be responsible. An attorney familiar with real estate law in Arizona may be able to offer guidance in this arena.

Source: FindLaw, “Legal Liability for Construction Defects,” accessed June 26, 2015

Lead Counsel Rated LC
Lead Counsel Rated LC
Distinguished AV | Peer Review Rated | LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell | For Ethical Standards & Legal Ability
Lead Counsel Rated LC
Lead Counsel Rated LC
FindLaw Network

Stay Connected With Us